The time stamp says.19pm, and I first noticed it.30.
I saw last night had 80 ratings.
Most people don't bother, even if they agree.
It's always hard to goedkope stacaravan huren nederland gauge how big particualar armies are - a while ago I imagined that the ljhfoS had about 9-12 identities, but this post above is telling.In that time, it has been rated an astonishing 51 sex kontakte erfurt times.It seems unlikely to me that there would be 51 people posting regularly to this newsgroup, leave aside 51 all waiting with bated breath.19 to read a copy and paste about NSW tax policies.Similarly, a post I made (just before reading the post above) on whaling scored 21 ratings - all negative - in the space of schweizer uhren geschichte about five minutes.One I saw by one of thje most persistent and obsessive c p spammers, who goes by the nick "Bonzo" had 48 ratings within just a few minutes.One, in particular, the ljhfoS, has been quite active.Do they really think that someone with something other than a pea for a brain will look more favourably on a post on the basis that ostensibly, 51 people have rated in with five stars, or discouraged because 40 people have said it was not.Now I've been around this place for a fair while, and since the rating system came in, in practice, most posts are unrated and even those that are tend not to attract more than a couple of ratings.
I post a bit in obal-warming and the fact that that group is dominated by posts from identities singing from the Fred Singer hymn sheet published at Denier Central despite the paucity of tinfoil hatted deniers out there in the actual community becomes a hell.
Again, it seems improbable that 21 people would be moved in that time to do anything in here.Really, it's not so much dishonest as stupid.The person doing this simply invites derision.Most of them are probably "Bonzo who, precisely because he's so busy, never has time to do much more than copy and paste.It seems then that I have to revise upwards my estimate of the size of the ljhfoS to something more in the vicinity of 50, although one post.I find it bizarre that there are people out there who imagine that it's a good use of their time to create massive numbers of multiple identities, essentially so they can spam the rating system.It's a funny old world.
Anything above five ratings is suspicious, particularly if they are unanimously positive or negative, but in the case above, on the face of it, 51 separate people rated the LJH identity within 11 minutes - one every 15 seconds - all of them agreeing, apparently.
Permalink, raw Message, tax windfall boosts NSW surplus, in recent weeks I've spent a bit of time discussing the existence of sockpuppet armies on usenet.